The 17th Amendment: A Case for an Article V Convention

The structure and shortcomings of the United States government have been debated since its founding. Recently, there has been a growing call for a convening of an Article V Convention of States to address many of these issues. This convention is crucial to tackling several federal government abuses, including excessive spending, jurisdictional overreach, and entrenched career politicians—all problems that could have been avoided if not for the ratification of the 17th Amendment.

The 17th Amendment: A Shift in Power

The 17th Amendment, ratified in 1913, changed how U.S. Senators are elected. Before this change, Senators were chosen by their state legislatures, as stated in Article I, Section 3, Clause 1 of the Constitution. This design ensured that Senators acted as ambassadors representing their states within the federal government, not just the citizens of their states. The 17th Amendment, however, introduced direct popular elections for Senators, shifting their focus from representing their states to directly serving the voters of their states.

This shift has caused significant changes in how states and the federal government interact. For example, Senators elected by popular vote tend to focus more on campaign fundraising and winning votes than on representing their states' interests. As a result, federal legislation and policies often do not reflect what is best for their states.

The Consequences of Popular Elections

The effects of the 17th Amendment are clear in how federal governance functions today. Like Representatives, Senators now focus on popular opinion and party loyalty, leading to higher federal spending and overreach. This has contributed to the national debt, which has grown to about $37 trillion since the amendment's ratification.

Had the original structure remained, we could likely have avoided today's severe fiscal challenges. For example, if States had kept the power to choose their Senators, there would be less pressure to support costly federal programs, especially those that infringe on state rights. Senators would be more likely to consider the long-term impacts of their decisions on their states instead of focusing solely on short-term reelection goals.

The Role of State Legislatures

The Senate's original design allowed state legislatures to influence federal legislation directly. Each state, regardless of size, was granted two Senators, ensuring equal representation. This structure was vital for safeguarding the interests of smaller states and preventing majority rule from overshadowing minority concerns. It also protected more rural conservative states from being dominated by states with densely populated urban liberal areas.

By enabling state legislatures to appoint Senators, the Constitution aimed to establish a system of checks and balances. Legislation, including annual budgets, that lacked support from a majority of states would face significant obstacles. This system not only required a broader consensus but also reduced the chance of overreach by the federal government.

The 17th Amendment and Term Limits

Article I, Section 3, Clause 1, states: The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.

Had the 17th Amendment not repealed Article I, Section 3, Clause 1, of the Constitution, term limits for Senators would not be an issue today. Article I, Section 3, Clause 1 clearly states that a senator may only serve, "for six Years." It does not state nor imply that a Senator may serve multiple terms of six-year periods. As a result of the 17th Amendment, Senators serve six-year terms without any specified limit.

Engaging the Public and State Legislatures

For a Convention of States to succeed, widespread public engagement is essential. State legislatures, such as the North Carolina State Legislature, play a crucial role. By passing resolutions that advocate for a Convention of States, they demonstrate a commitment to restoring state sovereignty, fiscal responsibility, and ending career politicians. Currently, nineteen state legislatures have passed resolutions calling for such a convention. North Carolina stands on the verge of becoming the twentieth state to pass a resolution calling for the convening of a Convention of States.

Such a resolution has passed in the North Carolina State Senate and awaits approval in the North Carolina House of Representatives. However, without intervention by the citizens of North Carolina, this resolution may once again go by the wayside.

A Call to Action

The necessity of an Article V Convention of States is urgent. As citizens, we have the duty to support the essential reforms that will safeguard our rights and uphold the integrity of government. By uniting and advocating for a Convention of States, we can work toward a future that reflects the framers' vision for the Constitution and restores the balance of power between the states and the federal government.

In this critical time in our nation's history, let’s act to ensure our government remains answerable to the people and that the rights of individual states are preserved. The moment for change is now. Every North Carolinian is urged to contact their District Representative and demand that they apply any necessary pressure on colleagues who are blocking our path to becoming the 20th state in the nation to pass a resolution calling for a convention of states.

Visit americaninsanity.org to learn how to become "The Informed Citizen" and gain valuable insights into the issues facing our communities.