G-8CN2F3F4XD ​
top of page

SUPREME COURT DEALS BLOW TO CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES

  • Writer: LeRoy Cossette
    LeRoy Cossette
  • May 23
  • 2 min read
ree

Two supposedly Christian Conservative Republican Supreme Court Justices once again dealt a blow to the Christian Conservative Republican voters by siding with the liberal left Justices.


Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Oklahoma’s refusal to allow for the establishment of religious public-school charters funded by taxpayers in the same manner as our failed federally funded public schools are funded. Had St. Isidore, who brought the suit, prevailed, they would have been our nation’s first religious public charter school.


Further, had the Supreme Court overturned the Oklahoma ruling, the number of religious public-school charters nationwide would have exploded, significantly improving the quality of education provided to our children at taxpayer expense. Religious public charter schools would have rapidly overshadowed our current federally funded, failed, and union-controlled public school system.


Again and again, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett have shown themselves to be more sympathetic to the anti-Christian left than to the Judeo-Christian values that were the foundation of our Constitution.


John Roberts far too often votes with the liberals, raising the question as to whether he is indeed a Christian Conservative Republican or just another RINO in Washington, D.C. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who recused herself but did not explain her recusal, is developing a history of recusing herself whenever any issue of great controversy is brought before the Supreme Court.


The First Amendment to the Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


The Constitution is obvious on this matter, and no notes or writings by the Founding Fathers on the issue indicate otherwise. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion... " This wording does not indicate nor imply “a separation of church and state” as the anti-Christian left wing would have the American citizens believe. NO wording within the Constitution prohibits any interaction between existing religious institutions established by the citizens of this Nation and the government.


The one-page opinion states that “an equally divided court affirms the judgment: Therefore, the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s June 2024 ruling against St. Isidore remains in place.


But the fight is far from over. Legal entities have stated that a new challenge, not requiring Justice Barrett’s recusal, will probably return to the court in short order, especially now that the court has shown its interest in taking on the issue.


They have further indicated that it appeared that Chief Justice Roberts was the deciding vote, but his vote with the three liberals may have been a vote to postpone a decision as a substantive ruling on the matter.


This battle is expected to continue and, soon, end with a majority Supreme Court ruling favoring the establishment of religious charter schools funded by taxpayers.


Public Christian charter schools, like public schools and public charter schools, have a right to be funded by taxpayer dollars because public Christian charter schools are just, if not more, dedicated to helping all children succeed in a challenging world.

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page