From Lenin to Equity: Marxist Ideas Repackaged for a New Generation

What A Vickie Hyatt Victory Would Mean For Haywood County

Local elections rarely make national headlines, but they shape daily life in the most direct ways. County commissioners influence budgets, land use, emergency services, public health programs, housing policy, and the relationship between county government and local towns.

That is why the race for Haywood County commissioner deserves close attention. A Vickie Hyatt victory would not simply add one new name to the board. It could shift the county’s direction, especially if voters believe her campaign reflects a broader political project tied to Asheville-area activist networks and progressive policy models.

The central question is simple: What kind of county does Haywood want to be after November?

Haywood County voters must weigh what kind of future they want for our communities.

County government can seem distant until a decision lands close to home. Commissioners vote on spending priorities, local partnerships, public programs, zoning questions, and the tone of government itself.

A board of commissioners can choose a limited-government approach, focused on core services and fiscal restraint. It can also choose a more activist approach, using county resources to expand social programs, partner with outside groups, and reshape local policy around regional models.

That is why voters are paying attention to Hyatt’s reported outreach beyond Haywood County. Her time with Asheville-Buncombe community groups, including Beloved Asheville, has raised concerns among residents who do not want Haywood to follow Asheville's political path.

Asheville and Haywood County are neighbors, but they are not the same place. They have different histories, different cultures, and different expectations of government. Many Haywood residents value a more conservative, faith-rooted, locally controlled approach. They do not want county policy imported from activist circles in a larger, more progressive city.

Beloved Asheville is known as an extreme activist socialist organization involved in issues such as shaltering the homeless; providing taxpayer funded welfare; encouraging drug addiction through free needles programs; free junk food, electronic devices, and entertainment, all without any expectations or conditions in return for those taxpayer benefits. Beloved Asheville supporters may describe that work as compassion but in reality does nothing to solve the problems and sentences the homeless and addicted to a life of total dependancy on the government. Asheville-Buncombe, Beloved Asheville, Firestone Books are groups whose approach reflects far-left activism, expanded government dependency, and policy ideas that would not fit Haywood County.

This is what Vickie Hyatt stands for and is determined to impose on Haywood County residents.

That concern should not be brushed aside. When a candidate spends time learning from groups outside the county, voters have every right to ask what ideas the candidate wants to bring home.

A county commissioner candidate should answer direct questions, including:

• Which Asheville-area policies does she support?

• Which programs would she oppose bringing to Haywood County?

• Would she support low-barrier homeless shelters in Haywood?

• Would she support harm-reduction programs involving needles or drug-use supplies?

• How would she prevent any county program from encouraging more homelessness, public drug use, or crime?

• What would these programs cost local taxpayers?

  
  

These are fair questions. They are not personal attacks. They go to the heart of county governance.

County government decisions can shape taxes, services, public safety, and community character.

Homelessness and addiction are serious problems. They also require careful policy. Good intentions do not guarantee good results.

Socialist governed communities have adopted low-barrier shelter policies, public camping tolerance, or harm-reduction programs as part of their response. They argue these efforts reduce overdose deaths and connect people to services. However, history has shown that a majority, if not all, socialist-communist governed programs are poorly managed, and rather than solve the problems, actually draw more need into the area, strain law enforcement, burden taxpayers, and make public spaces unsafe.

Haywood County voters should not have to guess where any candidate stands.

If Hyatt supports any version of these programs, she should explain the details. If she does not, she should say so clearly. If she believes Asheville-area efforts offer useful lessons, she should identify which lessons and how they would be adapted to Haywood County’s size, budget, and values.

The issue is not whether people in crisis deserve compassion. They do. The issue is whether county policy should create incentives, costs, and public safety risks that residents never approved.

That distinction matters. Haywood can care for people while still enforcing laws, protecting neighborhoods, and demanding accountability from public officials.

Every new county program costs money. Even grants and outside funding come with staff time, reporting requirements, future funding obligations, and political strings. Once a program starts, ending it is difficult at best.

That is why voters should press all commissioner candidates on spending. A promise to “help the community” is not enough. The real questions are practical:

• What will the program cost in year one?

• What will it cost after outside funding ends?

• Will it require new county employees?

• Will it increase pressure on law enforcement, EMS, or social services?

• How will success be measured?

• Who has the authority to shut it down if it fails?

  
  

Haywood County at a Crossroads: What a Vickie Hyatt Victory Could Mean in November is more than a campaign theme. It is a governing question. If county leaders adopt policies modeled after Asheville, residents should know the price before the vote, not after.

A local ballot carries real consequences for county budgets and policy direction.

Hyatt may present herself as a conservative farmer. Voters should test that claim against policy positions, affiliations, public statements, and voting commitments. Labels are easy. Records and platforms matter more.

The same standard should apply to every candidate. Republican candidates Tommy Long, David Burnette, and Jeff Stines should also be judged by what they will do, not just by party label. If they promise conservative government, voters should expect clear commitments on taxes, public safety, property rights, schools, infrastructure, and resistance to outside political agendas.

Still, party alignment tells voters something. A Republican board is more likely to reflect Haywood County’s traditional conservative instincts. A Democratic socialist shift will open the door to new partnerships, programs, and policies that many county residents do not want.

That choice should be made openly.

Before Election Day, residents should seek answers in public forums, interviews, candidate pages, and local reporting. Screenshots and rumors are not enough. Neither are vague campaign slogans.

Look for direct commitments on:

• Local control: Haywood policy should be made for Haywood County, not copied from Asheville or any other city.

  
  

• Public safety: Compassion must not come at the expense of safe neighborhoods, parks, roads, and business districts.

  
  

• Fiscal responsibility: New programs should have clear costs, limits, and accountability.

  
  

• Transparency: Any partnership with outside activist groups should be public, recorded, and open to taxpayer review.

  
  

• Community values: County leaders should respect the faith, family, property, and civic traditions that many Haywood residents hold dear.

  
  

The future of Haywood County will be shaped by the leaders voters choose.

This election is about more than one candidate. It is about whether Haywood County keeps a conservative, locally grounded approach or moves toward a more socialist-communist model associated with Asheville-area activism.

Local elections are often decided by turnout. The future of Haywood County will be decided by the residents who show up, study the choices, and vote.

<<<< OR >>>>

 The "Informed Citizen" is a Judeo-Christian conservative blog and website dedicated to providing information on our Constitution and the country's governance, enabling you, the voter, to make informed decisions at the ballot box.

 If you are interested in participating in Zoom classes to learn about our Constitution, what the Constitution actually states, the meaning behind the Articles, the history behind its creation, along with informational conversations, please visit americaninsanity.org  and subscribe to “The Informed Citizen.” 

Together, our voices as Judeo-Christian conservatives will resonate more powerfully than ever.

Please share this post with your contacts. Everyone needs to be an informed citizen so they, too, can better understand our Constitution, what our elected officials are doing to support or abuse it, and thereby make informed decisions at the ballot box.

Neither the “Informed Citizen” Blog nor I, the editor and owner of this blog, am in any way affiliated with or speak on behalf of any political party or individual. What is posted are researched facts or, when appropriate, identified as being "My Opinion."