Endless Screen Time Harming Students

North Carolina's $3 Billion Education Mistake

North Carolina invested over $3 billion to equip every K-12 student with a laptop or iPad, aiming to modernize education and promote equity. Instead, this massive push has turned classrooms into near-constant screen environments, raising serious questions about its impact on student learning and well-being. The state’s education leaders must confront the consequences of this decision and consider a new path forward.

For more than ten years, North Carolina’s education system has steadily increased its reliance on digital devices. Today, public schools hold more than 1.2 million laptops and tablets, with about 75% of these devices going home with students daily. This widespread adoption was framed as a step toward innovation, personalized learning, and equal access to technology.

The promise of technology in classrooms was to enhance learning experiences, but the outcome has often been the opposite. Students spend much of their school day staring at screens, which can lead to:

• Reduced attention spans

• Increased distractions

• Lower retention of information

• Struggles with deep reading and critical thinking

  
  

Many educators and parents report that students are more distracted and less engaged than before the device push. Instead of supporting learning, the devices sometimes serve as "distraction machines," making it difficult for students to focus on lessons.

North Carolina’s history with education trends shows a pattern of adopting popular ideas without fully understanding their effects. The “whole language” reading method, which emphasized guessing words from context rather than phonics, is a notable example. It led to many students struggling with reading until lawmakers mandated science-based instruction.

The digital device craze is the latest fad with unintended consequences. Without clear evidence that constant screen use improves learning, North Carolina risks repeating past mistakes.

One argument for providing every student with a device was to promote equity, ensuring all children have access to technology regardless of their background. While well-intentioned, this policy has also limited parental control. Many parents feel powerless to reduce their children’s screen time during school hours or to opt out of device use.

This lack of choice can be frustrating for families concerned about the effects of excessive screen exposure on their children’s health and development.

Admitting that the $3 billion investment has not delivered the expected benefits is the first step. Moving forward, the state must consider:

• Balancing screen time with traditional learning methods

• Providing teachers with training on effective technology use

• Involving parents in decisions about device policies

• Conducting independent research on the impact of screen time in schools

• Exploring alternatives that support hands-on and social learning

  
  

These steps can help create a more thoughtful approach to technology in education, one that supports students rather than overwhelms them.

==================================================================================

"The Informed Citizen" is a Judeo-Christian conservative blog and website dedicated to providing information on our Constitution and the country's governance, enabling you, the voter, to make informed decisions at the ballot box.

If you are interested in participating in Zoom classes to learn about our Constitution, what the Constitution actually states, the meaning behind the Articles, the history behind its creation, along with informational conversations, please visit americaninsanity.org  and subscribe to “The Informed Citizen.”

Together, our voices as Judeo-Christian conservatives will resonate more powerfully than ever.

Please share this post with your contacts. Everyone needs to be an informed citizen, so they, too, can better understand our Constitution, what our elected officials are doing to either support or abuse our Constitution and thereby make informed decisions at the ballot box.