Idolatry In Politics: Never Worship Those Who Serve

Photo by Tom Fisk 

Universal politics is becoming disorganized.

Honest and competent leaders are becoming rare, and the moment people spot a relatively good one, they automatically put them on a pedestal. Idolatry in politics may seem like a harmless and almost natural progression of adoration. However, when politicians are meant to be scrutinized and celebrated critically, extreme devotion hinders any intelligent evaluation and thus holds back progress.

Great politicians are made to be challenged to do better and reminded to stay rooted in honest service, not to be worshipped. But in today’s world, where the number of effective public servants is on a steady decline, does it become justifiable to flatter the good ones?

Good ones make people hope for worldly salvation. Good ones make promises and deliver substantial improvements. Hence, it’s only natural that they’re admired, and there’s no better way to encourage them to maintain their quality of service than singing praise.

But, as with everything else, there’s a limit to how much of this should be done.

What Is the Ideology of Idolatry in Politics: Making Gods of Leaders

Any of the best books on political apathy and politics, in general, have a single underlying message: people must be vigilant of the leaders they put in position. Vigilance in the sense that these leaders are squarely seen as how they are and what they do. People are called upon to practice the exact opposite of political apathy; they’re encouraged to closely scrutinize elected leaders.

As humans, it’s almost inherent to feel some sense of fondness for leaders who win their hearts and trust. However, winning one thing doesn’t automatically equate to winning everything. Simply because they have presented themselves in an ideal light, this doesn’t make them entirely faultless.

Politicians aren’t merely “public figures” or people to be ogled by. They’re leaders meant to serve, and putting them in such high regard is dangerous.

This blurs the line of obligation. It makes people lose sight of what matters most: holding politicians accountable when necessary.

Idolatry in politics is sparked by people’s affinity with these politicians, and with the intense dramatization of politics, this sense of closeness triggers people to resolutely defend “their leader.”

The Dangers of Political Idolatry

People defending their options isn’t something new. However, in the sphere of politics, this can have a devastating impact on healthy democracy.

To prove their stance and show how better their choice is, people begin to sensationalize leaders, campaigns, or political parties. In the process of taking a stance, people who idolize politicians often misconstrue facts to back their claims.

A man sitting with his laptop in the dark | Photo by John Tekeridis

Unfortunately, misinformation isn’t the only possible adverse effect of such idolatry.

Erosion of Critical Thinking

When people idolize their leaders, they see them through what may be the political equivalent of “rose-colored glasses.” They cease to evaluate these figures' actions, decisions, and policies, wholeheartedly believing they mean no harm and cannot do anything wrong.

Idolatry in politics makes people blindly accept politicians’ words and actions without question. They think less critically as they welcome anything these leaders implement, hindering constructive dialogue that may push universal and democratic progress.

Suppression of Dissent

When people see no harm from their leaders, they ensure everybody else does so too. This creates an environment where feedback or criticisms are silenced, and dissent is suppressed. Whoever speaks ill of these idolized leaders will face the wrath of their followers. These people are ready to be hostile, ostracize, or even make enemies of people who only want the betterment of the government.

Not only does this stifle criticism, but it easily villainizes anyone who shares their ideas.

Rise of Authoritarianism

Idolatry in politics puts politicians on a pedestal. This reverses the dynamics. Instead of working for the people to meet their demands, they turn the tables around. Idolized leaders feel superior. The lack of accountability empowers them to feel like they are law. From public servants, they become untouchable figures who are above the people who they should’ve served originally.

Instead of implementing morally upright laws that improve society, these leaders make threats that make people surrender to them. Idolatry in politics tramples individual rights and freedom, leading to authoritarian tendencies in politicians.

Vulnerability to Manipulation

When people idolize politicians, they think their words are law. This means politicians can easily bend their words and manipulate public opinion about state matters. They can easily exploit people’s blind devotion, taking advantage of their trust. Idolatry in politics gives leaders the power to spread misinformation and give rise to populist movements that will impact democratic stability.

And with people’s profound devotion, these politicians will easily evade even such a threat. They won’t be held accountable despite evidently wrongful decisions.

Hindrance to Progress

Overall, what idolatry in politics gravely impacts is innovation and progress. When people are strictly devoted to a single leader and close their eyes to criticism and scrutiny, they hold back growth and improvement. Despite being presented with new ideas or perspectives, blind followers will only adhere to what their leader says, dismissing anything else as mere heresy.

The loyalty deeply embedded in idolization can be seductive. But by fostering critical thinking, people can safeguard the principles of a healthy democracy and enjoy a more equitable society.

If you want to hear more about other belief systems or ideologies that hamper political growth, LeRoy Cossette has them listed and defined in his book American Insanity. Grab a copy today!

Proven Strategies to Combat Political Apathy in Conservative Voters

Photo by August de Richelieu

When a person exhibits behavior showing no interest or energy in things, this is defined as apathy. With everything happening around us, especially recently and/or currently, it can be questionable for a person not to care. It can also be highly concerning if it affects others, just like politics. That is why it is a must that we all learn how to combat political apathy.

Political apathy is defined as a lack of interest in or apathy toward politics. It is described as an indifferent attitude toward political activities. Government corruption and its impact on democracy are matters that people should care about, as they will affect not only the community as a whole but also every individual.

"American Insanity," a book written by LeRoy E. Cossette, is a book that brings readers to light the fact that in the United States, as the title says, LeRoy's written work reflects on the political insanity that has taken over the country. The book addresses an American Citizen's apathetic perspective on the governing system, precisely on the elected officials and the ever-controlling Washington bureaucracy.

Hands forming a heart shape in the foreground, framing the American flag on a flagpole against a bright blue sky with scattered clouds.

Photo by Edgar Colomba

Our Responsibility Toward The Country

Every citizen has an obligation to their country. What obligation, you day? Everyone is responsible for taking care of their own lives and those of others. The world of politics holds a large impact our lives, which is why we must learn how to combat political apathy. With that said, how do we do this, combating voter apathy? Read down below:

Expand Beyond the Ballot

Voting is just one part of the wide puzzle in civic engagement. Take it further by immersing yourself in your community: attend events at local centers, run for the school board, or participate in public discussions about local policies. Don't let the voting booth be the sole platform for your concerns—reach out to local leaders and make your voice heard at city council meetings. Consider how your spending habits and time investments reflect your values. Transform civic engagement from an occasional activity into a consistent practice.

Adopt a Global Perspective

Focusing solely on your individual vote can make the process feel isolated or insignificant. Instead, think about the broader impact of your choices. Remember that many, including legal permanent residents, U.S. citizens in territories, and, in some states, formerly incarcerated individuals, may lack voting rights. Reflect on how proposed policies affect these groups. Consider candidates' stances on global issues, recognizing that U.S. foreign policy influences lives worldwide. Cast your vote with both your local and global community in mind.

Tie Voting to Your Beliefs

Although the Bible doesn’t specifically instruct Christians to vote, it does call us to care for those who are marginalized and impacted by societal policies. Choosing a candidate may sometimes be easy, but more often, it requires weighing imperfect options. Voting reflects an understanding of the challenges within communities and the imperfections of leaders. Even so, it is a hopeful act—an expression of faith in collective action and a commitment to building a more just and compassionate society.

Champion Civic Education

An informed electorate is the cornerstone of democracy. Many conservative voters disengage due to feeling overwhelmed or misinformed about political systems. Civic education can bridge this gap by poviding people with knowledge about government processes, policy impacts, and their rights. Hosting workshops, utilizing social media, and partnering with schools can boost civic awareness. When voters understand the significance of their choices, they're more likely to overcome apathy and participate meaningfully, which means success in knowing how to combat political apathy.

Zero in on both Economic and Local Concerns

Issues like economic stability, taxes, and local governance often resonate with conservative voters. Linking these priorities to civic participation can inspire sustained engagement. Show how voting and advocacy influence job growth, tax reforms, and community improvements to make the political process feel relevant and impactful. Grassroots efforts like town hall meetings and neighborhood forums foster discussion and action. When voters witness real-world outcomes tied to their involvement, they are more likely to stay engaged.

Turn to Trusted Community Leaders

Distrust in the media and political institutions often leads to disengagement among conservatives. To counter this, it’s important to lean on figures within the community that you can truly trust —faith-based organizations, local leaders, and influential voices in conservative circles. These individuals can bridge the gap between politics and the community by aligning discussions with shared values and concerns.

For some, they hold the privilege to not care about the world and they choose to live in their own bubble, despite the knowledge the it is apparent to the eyes that there is a growing concern with regards to how the government are handling things.

For further insight into the challenges and solutions surrounding political engagement, consider reading American Insanity by Leroy Le Cossette. This thought-provoking book explores the complexities of modern politics and offers a deeper understanding of what drives apathy and how it can be addressed. Get your copy today at Barnes & Noble.

The Ethics Behind Voting for the Lesser of Two Evils

a photo of someone with an “I voted today” sticker | Image by freepik

What do people consider when voting for whoever gets to govern a whole country?

The constitution requires a different set of requirements for who gets to run for such positions, requirements that typically only measure whether they’re rightfully citizens of the country. Yet, when it comes to the nitty-gritty of scrutinizing their values and ethics, it’s the people who calculate who’s competent and empathetic enough to lead.

Unfortunately, there’s a growing principle that, instead of meticulously weighing these factors, people choose and vote for the lesser of two evils. Where has this rule stemmed from, and what is its payoff?

The Downfall of Good Governance in America

In discussing the principle of choosing the lesser of two evils, the matter of why voting systems have been deduced to this can’t be avoided. People are forced to compromise morals and the soundness of their choices because there has been a gradual decrease in suitable candidates.

Regardless of the standards they’re trying to uphold, people don’t have the option to weigh these over. Instead of choosing which candidate is the closest to meeting their conditions and demands, they’re forced to focus on who portrays a lesser wrongful and unpleasant nature.

Choosing the lesser of two evils is banked on the shortage of suitable candidates; people have no other option but to go for those who can perpetrate a more minor sense of chaos. Voting following such a principle would be alarming to any country. Unfortunately, it’s currently increasing in America.

In his book about American Insanity, LeRoy Cossette addresses the corruption that’s slowly chipping away at America’s sense of balance. In discussing the deceit and dishonesty the government is seemingly proudly broadcasting, the author also touches on people’s apathy regarding the current political state and system.

Is it nonchalance about malfeasance?

Have they gotten accustomed to their seemingly perpetual hardship?

Or have they given up looking for the perfect president?

A photo of people voting | Image by freepik

Everything begs the question: why do people continue to vote for incompetent and awful figures?

When they’re the ones suffering and directly struggling from the consequences of their decisions, why do they never learn?

What Does Lesser of Two Evils Mean?

When people vote for the lesser of two evils, what do they truly mean by “evil?” What encompasses an evil governance or president?

In a general context, the word evil does convey an extremely negative connotation. It’s something nobody wants to encounter or meet, the subject of everyone’s nightmare. Hence, it’s no wonder why the principle of voting for the lesser of two evils, especially in the context of everyone’s safety and well-being, leaves a bitter taste in one’s mouth.

No election has existed where people had a unanimous decision.

This can be because people are typically divided between Democrats and Republicans. With this, there has always been contradiction and debate on which leader is more competent. This may be because no candidate has impressed everyone to the point of eradicating partisanship and uniting everyone. Instead of choosing someone who everyone likes and has an undebated history of accomplishments proving themselves worthy, voters are presented with lousy candidates.

Not being able to do anything, they such it up and vote for the lesser of two evils. After all, they can’t live in a lawless country with nobody, at least holding control and loyalty over most people.

In the context of politics, “lesser of two evils” means the candidate who’s less lousy and incompetent, someone who they can tolerate enough to give such power. When presented with equally awful candidates, it’s every voter’s moral responsibility to determine who’s less evil. It’s not like they can abstain from voting. This would be worse than choosing the lesser of two evils.

It’s an unfortunate principle to embrace and an even more unfortunate realization that this is the reality most countries are living with. However, when there’s no other option, people have nowhere else to go but where there could be less damage incurred. Unless someone perfectly aligns with everyone’s demands and beliefs, voters must choose the lesser of two evils.

A photo of someone on a podium to speak | Image by freepik

The Existence of “Evil” in American Politics

This is among the various factors to consider why America usually ends up suffering from bad governance – the fact that they seemingly have or perceive all of their candidates as “evil,” or else why would they have to choose who tips such a scale?

Why can’t they go for someone good, not only lesser evil?

At the root of this is the system. The reason why “evil” candidates exist is simply because of America and how it molds people – the same people who vote and get voted. It’s a never-ending cycle, which the country will constantly suffer from unless there are pragmatic changes in perspectives.

There’s a seemingly growing hate against politicians. However, what people fail to consider is that these politicians are merely representatives of who they are. No matter how corrupt they appear to be, these individuals are Americans birthed in the same country and given the same (some, only better) resources as everyone else growing up. Now, where do things go wrong?

It’s the system that corrupts people, giving them the lure of power and the temptation of greed.

It’s the system that produces garbage one after another that people are forced to vote for the lesser of two evils and not who they actually believe will make a difference.

As individualistic as the country is, it can seem unfair to deduce that Americans vote for self-serving purposes. But there should still be ample space given to cater to this presumption.

Regardless of motivations, voters aren’t given many options to nitpick. They don’t have alternatives that can guarantee to provide for their needs. Instead, they are constrained to vote for who they think is the lesser of two evils – an unfortunate yet prevalent perspective in politics.

If you’re interested in uncovering the horrors of the American Government, read more of LeRoy Cossette’s American Insanity. Grab a copy of the book now!