I share the following impressions after reading Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025—Mandate for Leadership and former President Trump’s Agenda 47.
Delving into the depths of both Project 2025 and Agenda 47 is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the recommendations. This knowledge will empower you to discern the truth amidst the many claims about what Project 2025 advocates and its potential impact on America.
As a Constitutional Conservative, I firmly believe that Project 2025's recommendations present pragmatic solutions to overhaul an 'administrative state' that has swelled, malfunctioned, and strayed from the people's will. I see these recommendations as a beacon of hope necessary for shaping a promising future for governance in America.
Project 2025 is unwavering in its commitment to the Constitution and the rule of law. Its focus on the much-needed consolidation of authority and accountability and its emphasis on foundational principles instill confidence in the reader about the Project's dedication to well-structured and lawful governance.
Project 2025 rightly points out that it must be the prerogative of all incoming presidents, Democrat or Republican, to appoint officials who support their agenda since presidents are elected on their proposed agendas.
Its recommendations task a sitting President with limiting, controlling, and directing the executive branch on behalf of the American people” by having the discipline to do the right thing instead of choosing to do whatever they desire.
The Project 2025 recommendations acknowledge a pressing need for our Republic to return to a constitutional structure the founding fathers would recognize. This can only be achieved by massively shrinking the administrative state.
The recommendations underscore that the administrative state will persist until Congress seizes power back from the federal bureaucracy, returns to its constitutional responsibilities, restores power over Washington to the American people, and brings the administrative state to heel.
Unfortunately, many of the recommendations made in Project 2025 are not included in Trump’s Agenda 47. That is not to say that Agenda 47 will not bring about much-needed change, but in my opinion, all recommendations in Project 2025 should be adopted.
Project 2025 – Mandate for Leadership is a well-thought-out document.
==================================================================================
Your thoughts regarding this article are welcome for discussion and to share various viewpoints.
Comments